Abstract
Contemporary scholars have separated artificial intelligence (AI) from utilitarianism, which represents instrumental rationality, and have shifted toward the Responsibility and Virtue Ethics of practical rationality. The Strong and Weak Accountability AI embodies abstract freedom and presupposes human nature; however, the collective policies formed by it often conflict with individuality, being either unchangeable or ineffective in shaping individuality. Without addressing inherited structural drawbacks or challenging oppressive social norms, it is difficult to expect a Virtue AI to promote an established good life. This article proposes AI, through the instrumental rationality embodied in utilitarianism, broadens the conditions for understanding moral purposes. AI should be viewed as a tool, rather than the ultimate solution. Prioritizing history does not lie in contemplating the potential crisis posed by machines manipulating agents, but rather in highlighting the reality of whether AI’s specific feedback to humans is open, transparent, and consonant with human rights. Utilitarianism AI presents morally open structures that are manifested through social adjustments, the physical realm of emotional conflicts, and the physiological foundations underpinning self-motivation.
Schlagwörter
AI
Artificial Intelligence
Responsibility theory
Utilitarianism
Virtue ethics