Jump to content

EEG-based analysis of evoked potentials – Differentiating between pain and sensory reactions under cognitive distraction

Fast facts

  • Further publishers

    Ilayda Kekec

  • Publishment

    • Berlin ; Boston: De Gruyter 2025
  • Journal

    Joint Journal of the German Society for Biomedical Engineering in VDE and the Austrian and Swiss Societies for Biomedical Engineering and the German Society of Biomaterials (1)

  • Organizational unit

  • Subjects

    • Biomedical technology
    • Neurology
  • Research fields

    • BioMedicalTechnology (BMT)
  • Publication format

    Conference poster

Quote

I. Kekec, H. Barioudi, and T. Felderhoff, "EEG-based analysis of evoked potentials - Differentiating between pain and sensory reactions under cognitive distraction," in Joint Journal of the German Society for Biomedical Engineering in VDE and the Austrian and Swiss Societies for Biomedical Engineering and the German Society of Biomaterials, 2025, vol. 70, no. 1, p. 201 [Online]. Available: https://programme.conventus.de/en/bmt-2025/program/program-points/64d076fb-2452-4b77-9467-b105f6097784

Content

Introduction: This study investigates Pain-Related Evoked Potentials (PREPs) in EEG, triggered by epidermal electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve near the elbow. The aim was to analyze the impact of cognitive distraction on these potentials.

Methods: 18 subjects participated in two scenarios: stimulation with and without cognitive distraction. EEG data was recorded using the OpenBCI Ultracortex Mark IV dry electrode headset with a sampling frequency of 250 Hz. The data were filtered using a notch filter to remove power line noise and a bandpass filter from 0.1 to 10 Hz. The EEG data was analyzed using MATLAB.

Results: No significant differences were found in the amplitudes (N1/P1/N2/P2) or PREP durations between scenarios. Pain-typical signal morphologies were also observed in a subject who perceived the stimulation as pleasant. Overall mean values across all subjects revealed similar PREP patterns in both scenarios, with P1 amplitudes of 3.74 μV (scenario 1) and 3.98 μV (scenario 2), and PREP durations (P1 to P2) of 524 ms and 680 ms respectively. Individual analysis showed slight variations between scenarios (P1 amplitudes: 2.87 ± 1.6 μV vs 3.83 ± 2 μV).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the recorded signals might represent unspecific sensory reactions, not genuine pain responses. This study underscores the need to further differentiate between pain-specific and general sensory reactions in EEG and critically question the

About the publication

Notes and references

This site uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and to collect statistical data. You can object to the statistical collection via the data protection settings (opt-out).

Settings(Opens in a new tab)